ScrummasterDifferent


Is the role of Scrum Master different at your company?

 

Is the role different at your company (than at a "regular" company)?

 

And should it be different?

 

Joe's comments:

 

I am not at all clear that there should be a difference. I am totally ok with variations on the theme, based on special circumstances. But the standard case...I just think that the Agile community has thought about the basic role enough. And the company, normally, is not that different.

 

NOW...I did modify things at first on one project to allow the PM a bigger role, because I did not think a "fight" with the PM was worth the candle at that time. AND...I'm ok with having another role called "PM" that does some things (details regarding key controls, obtaining resources, updates to some systems). This "PM" role is probably part-time, not full-time.

 

I generally think early journeyman coaches should only be coaches (SMs). They need no other work to burden themselves, to confuse their role to themselves, to confuse their role in the minds of their Team and their PO.

 

End of Joe's comments.

 

So, let's call the standard role SM and the different role, at this hypothetical company, "SM-C".

 

What are the differences (as practiced now)? And should each difference exist? Or what might the allowed differences be?

 

.

.

 

 

Comments